Upgrading front brakes 2500

Everything that keeps your car in contact with the road, and from contacting other road users.
Message
Author
johnnydog
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 12:33 pm
Location: Lancashire

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#21 Post by johnnydog »

When I had my Stag (which I sold approx. 3 years ago to a chap over the water in Sydney...), I found that the brakes were a bit 'wooden' and needed reasonable effort to brake hard. Yet the brakes on all my 2000 /2500's are good, don't need much effort to pull up hard. I do think the very late Mk1's that were produced with the Mk2 brake setup on were exceptionally good. However, I always use a good quality asbestos pad (I fortunately still have a plentiful supply of genuine Lockheed in the yellow boxes that came complete with pins and springs fitting kit), which I know now 'aren't available in the shops', but can still be bought at autojumbles quite cheaply. Trouble is that jumblers mark them up as Stag pads and then ask 3x the price! Rover and Ford Transit pads also fit, but don't command the price of a Stag pad although I believe they are the same, but you wont get the 'fitting kit'......
Register Member no. 1596

1967 Mk1 2000 in Gunmetal Grey
1969 Mk1 2000 in Royal Blue
1970 Mk2 2000 in Valencia Blue
1972 Mk2 2.5 PI in Triumph White
1973 Mk2 2.5 PI in Sienna Brown
1976 Mk2 2500S in Carmine Red
torque2me
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Hatfield

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#22 Post by torque2me »

CRAJ wrote: My pi (which has the Stag rear brakes), has all the components from the Stag, including the levers for the handbrake.
I also have the fronts, a Stag m/c and servo and dual circuits. The only part of the Stag setup missing is the PWDA valve and warning light.

I have only ever had the rears locking up on a trackday when braking hard and shifting down for a chicane in the middle of a long straight from 80+. Entirely understandable really :lol:

Never anything in normal road use.
I refurbed the rears thoroughly before install, checking for wear in everything. The handbrake is always awesome after a trackday, the continued hard use of the brakes really brings the rear self adjusters right up.

Colin
Colin,

Thanks for your reply. Reading other posts as well it seems that Master and Slave might be needed from the Stag parts list. I'll try getting hold of a master - the slave might not need changing as the 2.5 had 7/8"th for earlier Mk.2 and 1" for the late ones. Might then not need the longer levers but the way parts availability is for the saloon the Stag type might be the only ones about.

thanks,

Kev
Mike Stevens
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3649
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: South Oxfordshire, UK

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#23 Post by Mike Stevens »

James wrote:Don't fit Stag calipers and discs (and the rear) without changing to the Stag master cylinder.
While I understand the need to fit front and rears together to get the right balance, why do you need a Stag master cylinder as well?

To my simple brain, as long as the master bore is the same, thus giving the same fluid displacement, shouldn't it all work OK?

Mind you, I don't know the relative bore sizes of the 2000 and Stag masters! Should be easy to measure though - I have old ones of both around somewhere.

Cheers,
Mike.
(South Oxfordshire)
Register Member No 0355
1971 2.5PI Saloon Sapphire blue
1973 2.5PI Saloon rust some Honeysuckle
1973 Stag French blue
(1949 LandRover which is now back to its original light green!)
torque2me
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Hatfield

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#24 Post by torque2me »

Mike Stevens wrote:
James wrote:Don't fit Stag calipers and discs (and the rear) without changing to the Stag master cylinder.
While I understand the need to fit front and rears together to get the right balance, why do you need a Stag master cylinder as well?

To my simple brain, as long as the master bore is the same, thus giving the same fluid displacement, shouldn't it all work OK?

Mind you, I don't know the relative bore sizes of the 2000 and Stag masters! Should be easy to measure though - I have old ones of both around somewhere.

Cheers,
Mike.
Mike,

Did you ever get around to measuring the bores on the relvant m/c's?

Kev
User avatar
Andy Thompson
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:16 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#25 Post by Andy Thompson »

Mk1 2000 MC is 3/4"
Mk2 is 13/16" ( including dual circuit)
Stag is 7/8"

Stag and dual circuit Mk2 use same servo (nearly all Oz Mk 2 are dual)

Personally I find single circuit gives a better pedal but they are all different to a degree. Tweaking the servo pushrods length can make a huge different to pedal travel (and cause brakes to lock on if you get it wrong)

Just to be different my 2000 mk2 currently has Stag MC , 32mm piston 4 pot Mazda RX7 alloy calipers (monarch) with Mintex M1144 pads and 10.6" vented BMW E30 discs. Rear is 2000 drums and Ferodo NOS shoes with Stag slave cylinders (0.800")

Works beautifully
Perth WA
1970 2500PI estate
1964 2.7PI saloon
1973 2100 EFI Megasquirt
1972 Stag

http://triumphwestoz.blogspot.com/

Very Big garage
Mike Stevens
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3649
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: South Oxfordshire, UK

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#26 Post by Mike Stevens »

torque2me wrote:Did you ever get around to measuring the bores on the relvant m/c's?
No, sorry. Never seem to have enough time!

Andy seems to have answered the question though.

Cheers,
Mike.
(South Oxfordshire)
Register Member No 0355
1971 2.5PI Saloon Sapphire blue
1973 2.5PI Saloon rust some Honeysuckle
1973 Stag French blue
(1949 LandRover which is now back to its original light green!)
James
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#27 Post by James »

Another test of my HiSpec brake set up at Silverstone a couple of weeks ago — hammered them everywhere — no fade.
1969 2000 MkI EFI
1969 Spitfire MkIII
blog: http://www.mintylamb.co.uk/wordpress
twitter: http://twitter.com/jamescarruthers
User avatar
Andy Thompson
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:16 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#28 Post by Andy Thompson »

I bet you can go faster if you brake a little less :wink: - what pads?
Perth WA
1970 2500PI estate
1964 2.7PI saloon
1973 2100 EFI Megasquirt
1972 Stag

http://triumphwestoz.blogspot.com/

Very Big garage
James
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#29 Post by James »

Mintex 1144

Have to admit that the straights are fairly long at Silverstone and I expect they cool down between corners enough

It's my tyres that were going off — after a couple of laps they were all over the place.

I really need to get the remote IR temp sensors installed so I can see what's happening :)
1969 2000 MkI EFI
1969 Spitfire MkIII
blog: http://www.mintylamb.co.uk/wordpress
twitter: http://twitter.com/jamescarruthers
torque2me
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Hatfield

Re: Upgrading front brakes 2500

#30 Post by torque2me »

Andy Thompson wrote:Mk1 2000 MC is 3/4"
Mk2 is 13/16" ( including dual circuit)
Stag is 7/8"

Stag and dual circuit Mk2 use same servo (nearly all Oz Mk 2 are dual)

Personally I find single circuit gives a better pedal but they are all different to a degree. Tweaking the servo pushrods length can make a huge different to pedal travel (and cause brakes to lock on if you get it wrong)

Just to be different my 2000 mk2 currently has Stag MC , 32mm piston 4 pot Mazda RX7 alloy calipers (monarch) with Mintex M1144 pads and 10.6" vented BMW E30 discs. Rear is 2000 drums and Ferodo NOS shoes with Stag slave cylinders (0.800")

Works beautifully

Andy, thanks for posting the info.

Kev
Post Reply