I can confirm that removing an ARB makes a very noticeable difference!
Before I fitted new Superflex bushes to it, as an experiment I removed the ARB drop links and tried driving the car (2500S) out of interest.
(By the way, it had CW supplied uprated springs, KYB inserts, roller tops and so on.)
In other words, I would fit an ARB....
fitting an anti roll bar
Well...........
Owner of a 1979 Dolomite Sprint (EFI),
previously ran for nine years a Dolomite (1850), a 2500S (for 4 years), a Dolomite 1500HL (for a few months),
a Dolomite Sprint (for 10 years) and a second 2500S (for 5 years until 2007).
previously ran for nine years a Dolomite (1850), a 2500S (for 4 years), a Dolomite 1500HL (for a few months),
a Dolomite Sprint (for 10 years) and a second 2500S (for 5 years until 2007).
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
Some years ago, when I fitted all the S bits to my TC the difference with the ARB was (still is) quite noticable. Corners a lot flatter than it did previously.
Tony.
Tony.
1976 2500 TC. converted to S specs.
Lots of bits
1999 BMW Z3.
2006 BMW 325ti.
Hopefully not needing too many bits.
.
Lots of bits
1999 BMW Z3.
2006 BMW 325ti.
Hopefully not needing too many bits.
.
- David Withers
- Senior Member

- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:28 am
- Location: North Cambridgeshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
Same here. I fitted an ARB to my ex-2500PI back in the 1980s, with adjustable Koni dampers fitted to the rear at the same time. The handling was improved by quite a margin without reducing the comfort to any noticeable degree. I found it best to have the Konis set fairly soft, though harder drivers than myself might have set them firmer.tony wrote:Some years ago, when I fitted all the S bits to my TC the difference with the ARB was (still is) quite noticable. Corners a lot flatter than it did previously.
Tony.
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
I fitted new uprated springs, new shocks and and antiroll bar on my car just after I bought it. I had gone from a 6 year old Honda Civic with brillant handling (this was in about 1995!) to the triumph which rolled alarmingly in comparison.
I think Triumph fitted the front bar on the S version to help regain some roll control after raising the suspension slightly and fitting softer springs.
If your car hasn't had new shock absorbers, those and some stiffer springs will make a huge difference. Just a set of good quality shocks will take away a lot of the dramatic lean over when cornering. It will still happen but not as quickly.
I bought all of the parts from Chris Witor and thought I might as well get suspension arms ready to fit the anti roll bar while I was doing it.
I think Triumph fitted the front bar on the S version to help regain some roll control after raising the suspension slightly and fitting softer springs.
If your car hasn't had new shock absorbers, those and some stiffer springs will make a huge difference. Just a set of good quality shocks will take away a lot of the dramatic lean over when cornering. It will still happen but not as quickly.
I bought all of the parts from Chris Witor and thought I might as well get suspension arms ready to fit the anti roll bar while I was doing it.
- Jonathan Lewis
- Senior Member

- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:28 pm
- Location: Monmouthshire
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
Apparently, the engineers wanted to standardise the front ARB for the Mk2 in 1969, but the cost-counters had their wicked way... Even so, they had to put them on Estates and Police cars to curb roll with the stiffer rear springs - not sure what the thinking was on the 2500S saloon, but suspect that it was simply to allow the fitment of softer front springs to get a better ride.Steve G wrote:I think Triumph fitted the front bar on the S version to help regain some roll control after raising the suspension slightly and fitting softer springs.
I do wonder whether the same happened with the original Mk1 back in 1963 as some of the illustrations in the WSM clearly show a different design of drag strut with a lug adjacent to the forked end, possibly for an ARB mounting; also, I'm pretty sure that in one of the magazine write-ups at the time of launch, there was a certain effort to emphasise that an ARB was unnecessary due to the characteristics of the suspension set-up, which someone of a cynical outlook might have viewed as someone from the factory working hard to justify its omission...
That said, I agree entirely as to the benefit of good quality dampers. Even in standard form, with decent tyres fitted I've always felt levels of grip under cornering to be pretty impressive for a car of this size, weight and age.
Regards,
Jonathan Lewis
2.5PI Mk2
2.5PI Mk2
-
Mike Stevens
- Site Admin

- Posts: 3649
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm
- Location: South Oxfordshire, UK
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
I too have fitted an ARB to both the PIs I've had and the 2000. Without changing anything else, the handling was certainly improved. With new dampers/lowered springs etc that should only make it better still!
Cheers,
Mike.
Cheers,
Mike.
(South Oxfordshire)
Register Member No 0355
1971 2.5PI Saloon Sapphire blue
1973 2.5PI Saloon rust some Honeysuckle
1973 Stag French blue
(1949 LandRover which is now back to its original light green!)
Register Member No 0355
1971 2.5PI Saloon Sapphire blue
1973 2.5PI Saloon rust some Honeysuckle
1973 Stag French blue
(1949 LandRover which is now back to its original light green!)
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
I've got front and rear bars (front added on from an S), poly bushes everywhere, new higher rates springs, new konis all around and 15" rims with 205/55R15 Yokohama S Drives. It's literally like taking a vehicle that's 40 years old and dragging it into the current decade for handling- there is a huge difference. Each item has made a noticeable improvement in handling. (Of course the ride isn't as "cushy" as it was stock, but it feels 1000x safer when out on public roads.)
For the front anti roll bar make sure you invest in the "updated" end links which have a proper ball joint - I think they're a TR6 item? Rimmers sell them and they're a vast improvement on the stock end links. Of course, fit poly bushes everywhere on the bar too. http://www.rimmerbros.co.uk/Item--i-152143AUR
For the front anti roll bar make sure you invest in the "updated" end links which have a proper ball joint - I think they're a TR6 item? Rimmers sell them and they're a vast improvement on the stock end links. Of course, fit poly bushes everywhere on the bar too. http://www.rimmerbros.co.uk/Item--i-152143AUR
David
1971 MkII 2.5PI (fitted with Holden 3.3l, 6 cylinder engine and Toyota five speed manual gearbox)
1971 MkII 2.5PI (fitted with Holden 3.3l, 6 cylinder engine and Toyota five speed manual gearbox)
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
You could also potentially make the links out of rod ends easily enough
1969 2000 MkI EFI
1969 Spitfire MkIII
blog: http://www.mintylamb.co.uk/wordpress
twitter: http://twitter.com/jamescarruthers
1969 Spitfire MkIII
blog: http://www.mintylamb.co.uk/wordpress
twitter: http://twitter.com/jamescarruthers
-
red2000chris
- Senior Member

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:18 pm
- Location: taunton. somerset
Re: fitting an anti roll bar
think i will replace dampers and bushes and springs if they need it and try it for a while.
cheers
cheers
"life is great.....but no longer with a 2000