Comments for The Triumph 2000 2500 2.5 Register

Comment on January 2010 Car of the Month by Rob Baker

Rob Baker — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:04:21 +0000

Shades of Herald about the rear roof line as well.

Comment on January 2010 Car of the Month by kevinw

kevinw — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:20:52 +0000

Cartoon? Are you saying that it isn’t real life? I think the boot is from a 1300 FWD, myself and the bonnet lid from a mark 1 – so maybe he’s got a Stag engine as well?

Comment on January 2010 Car of the Month by Webmaster

Webmaster — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:11:45 +0000

Ah, but you’ve got to look at the boot in context of it’s cartoonish proportions. Enough of the primary attributes are still present: The nose, the sweep of the shoulder line from front to back, the lip over the rear window, even the wheel trims. Okay, Ted’s had a bit of a play with the bonnet and the rear wheel arches but the man’s an inveterate tinkerer, well known for it. Honest.

Comment on January 2010 Car of the Month by kevinw

kevinw — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:57:37 +0000

We’re not so sure that it is a Triumph 2500 any longer as a result of problems noted in getting parts. I think that the windscreen has the look of a Ford Angle Box about it and Ann thinks the boot looks more like a Hillman Imp